As most of you are no doubt already very much aware, later today, the House of Commons will cast the final vote on Stephen Woodworth's motion to establish a committee to study the current Criminal Code definition of "human being".
Courtesy of the Order Paper
, here's the full text of the motion:
That a special committee of the House be appointed and directed to review the declaration in Subsection 223(1) of the Criminal Code which states that a child becomes a human being only at the moment of complete birth and to answer the questions hereinafter set forth;
that the membership of the special committee consist of 12 members which shall include seven members from the government party, four members from the Official Opposition and one member from the Liberal Party, provided that the Chair shall be from the government party; that the members to serve on the said committee be appointed by the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs and the membership report of the special committee be presented to the House no later than 20 sitting days after the adoption of this motion;
that substitutions to the membership of the special committee be allowed, if required, in the manner provided by Standing Order 114(2);
that the special committee have all the powers of a Standing Committee as provided in the Standing Orders; and
that the special committee present its final report to the House of Commons within 10 months after the adoption of this motion with answers to the following questions,
(i) what medical evidence exists to demonstrate that a child is or is not a human being before the moment of complete birth, (ii) is the preponderance of medical evidence consistent with the declaration in Subsection 223(1) that a child is only a human being at the moment of complete birth, (iii) what are the legal impact and consequences of Subsection 223(1) on the fundamental human rights of a child before the moment of complete birth, (iv) what are the options available to Parliament in the exercise of its legislative authority in accordance with the Constitution and decisions of the Supreme Court to affirm, amend, or replace Subsection 223(1).
he vote is expected to get underway shortly after 6pm, but with M-312 as the third of three scheduled recorded divisions on private members' business, it could be closer to 6:30 before it comes up.
In any case, feel free to check back throughout the afternoon for coverage leading up to the vote -- and, of course, the reaction.
Attention #M312 vote speculators: You can safely mark Veterans PS Eve Adams down in the "hell to the no" column based on her QP outs. #hw